leearnold (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This comment will be deleted because you must CITE EVIDENCE that the safety net isn't going to be around by the time you qualify. There is no such evidence. The safety net will be here.The Social Security Board of Trustees construct three different scenarios every year -- and at the current time, Social Security is heading toward full solvency. Stop falling for scare stories. Emotions are not good arguments.

mtrcitymotown (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

If this so called safety net isn't going to be around by the time I qualify in drawing from it, than why in the hell should I have to pay for it. All I know is that my parents and my in-laws have it damn good like most their age do. They are collecting from retirement pensions and collecting from social security.

YahooPoolAimer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

If you earned 5% growth rates, then that would only be a 2% real return after inflation. Broker fees are minimum 1%, or 2% on average... which is most of your earnings.This is why countries like Chile with privatized pension plans have seen most of their market gains lost to fees and administration. Social Security is far less than 1/1000th the overhead of a traditional investment vehicle.Social Security is by far the most efficient system, revenues based on taxing the entire economy.

leearnold (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"Risk free" here means "FDIC insured" means "covered by a taxpayer bailout" if it crashes.Currently, Social Security is heading between the Trustee's low-cost and middle-cost projections. Hardly a failure, not even a big problem if it comes to it.

anthony1832 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

high yield accounts insured by the FDIC are completely risk free. Once you reach the maximum that the federal government will insure, its simple to find another bank with a high yield account. have the interest on your 100k-200k (depending on if you have a joint owner) spill over into a different high yield account at a different bank. It's simple, social security is a failure.

leearnold (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Learn about risk. Average return is not actual return --actual may be more, it may be less. And it doesn't pay-off in down cycles, nor help against some other possible adversities in life.

anthony1832 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

fair enough on the political thinglosing your shirt happens all the time, if you look short term. for large common stocks the worst single year was in 1931 with a average loss of 43.3% however, even that year is included in the 20 year indexes, and still the lowest average return has been a positive 3.1%

leearnold (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Losing your shirt is not hard to do either: see today's newspapers, Sept. 15, 2008.

leearnold (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I deleted your other comment because it advocated a political candidate. One of several reasons to get booted from here.

anthony1832 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

even at 3% which can be earned in an ING savings account and is risk free, and insured by the federal government up to $200,000 with a joint owner, you will still end up better than the social security system.Also, on a 20 year investment horizon the best average return on a large company stock portfolio has been 17.7%. The LOWEST has been a POSITIVE 3.1%, and that was during the great depression.earning 5% is not hard to do.